From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cecil v. Gallo

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Feb 15, 1943
57 Cal.App.2d 145 (Cal. Ct. App. 1943)

Opinion

Docket No. 6934.

February 15, 1943.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County striking certain portions of an answer. J.T.B. Warne, Judge assigned. Appeal dismissed on motion.

Edward T. Taylor for Appellants.

Earl Warren, Attorney General, Wm. T. Sweigert, Assistant Attorney General, W.R. Augustine, Deputy Attorney General, and Jefferson E. Peyser for Respondent.


THE COURT.

[1] Respondent brings this cause before us by way of motion to dismiss the appeal taken by appellants from an order striking out certain portions of defendants' answer to plaintiffs' first amended complaint. The clerk's transcript does not disclose that a final judgment has been entered.

On previous occasions this court has had before it similar questions. See Jordan v. Associated Discount Corp., 10 Cal.App.2d 96 [ 51 P.2d 1108], and Couch v. McGregor, 19 Cal.App.2d 633 [ 66 P.2d 159]. We find nothing in the present case to take it out of the well established rule that no appeal lies from such order. ( Tedford v. San Diego Electric Ry. Corp., 79 Cal.App. 505 [ 249 P. 1093]; § 963, Code Civ. Proc.)

Respondent's motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Cecil v. Gallo

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Feb 15, 1943
57 Cal.App.2d 145 (Cal. Ct. App. 1943)
Case details for

Cecil v. Gallo

Case Details

Full title:W.J. CECIL, as Director of Agriculture, etc., Respondent, v. ERNEST GALLO…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Third District

Date published: Feb 15, 1943

Citations

57 Cal.App.2d 145 (Cal. Ct. App. 1943)
134 P.2d 497

Citing Cases

Potter v. Richards

Third: Are appeals from (a) an order striking a portion of an amended complaint; (b) an order of the trial…