From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tedford v. San Diego Electric Railway Corporation

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Oct 15, 1926
79 Cal.App. 505 (Cal. Ct. App. 1926)

Opinion

Docket No. 4586.

October 15, 1926.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County striking out portion of amended answer. C.N. Andrews, Judge. Appeal dismissed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Read G. Dilworth and V.F. Bennett for Appellant.

D.F. Glidden and Allan Brant for Respondent.


THE COURT.

[1] It appearing from inspection of the record that the purported appeal is directed against a nonappealable order, to wit, an order striking out a portion of defendant's amended answer, it is ordered that the appeal be and the same hereby is dismissed.


Summaries of

Tedford v. San Diego Electric Railway Corporation

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Oct 15, 1926
79 Cal.App. 505 (Cal. Ct. App. 1926)
Case details for

Tedford v. San Diego Electric Railway Corporation

Case Details

Full title:SARAH J. TEDFORD, Respondent, v. SAN DIEGO ELECTRIC RAILWAY CORPORATION…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One

Date published: Oct 15, 1926

Citations

79 Cal.App. 505 (Cal. Ct. App. 1926)
249 P. 1093

Citing Cases

Neiderjohn v. Thompson

Mentzer Pickett, in reply. No writ of garnishment was issued on McConnell or the Rock River Mercantile…

Long v. Lester

These orders are not appealable. ( California Portland Cement Co. v. Boone, 181 Cal. 35 [ 183 P. 447];…