From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Catibayan v. Sycip Gorres Velayo & Co.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jul 1, 2015
609 F. App'x 428 (9th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 13-35989

07-01-2015

CESAR Y. CATIBAYAN, a U.S. citizen, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SYCIP GORRES VELAYO & CO., (SGV), a Philippine Accounting Firm, AKA SGV/Ernst & Young, (SGV/EY), Defendant - Appellee.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 3:13-cv-00273-HU MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon
Marco A. Hernandez, District Judge, Presiding
Before: HAWKINS, GRABER, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Cesar Y. Catibayan appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his diversity action for lack of personal jurisdiction over SyCip Gorres Velayo & Co. ("SGV"). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Picot v. Weston, 780 F.3d 1206, 1211 (9th Cir. 2015), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Catibayan's action for lack of personal jurisdiction because Catibayan failed to establish that SGV had sufficient contacts with Oregon such that maintenance of the suit there would not offend due process. See Or. R. Civ. P. 4(L); Walden v. Fiore, 134 S. Ct. 1115, 1121-23 (2014) (specific jurisdiction requires a defendant to have certain minimum contacts with the forum state); Mavrix Photo, Inc. v. Brand Techs., Inc., 647 F.3d 1218, 1223-24 (9th Cir. 2011) (general jurisdiction requires a defendant to have "continuous and systematic general business contacts" with the forum state (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); Gray & Co. v. Firstenberg Machinery Co., 913 F.2d 758, 760 (9th Cir. 1990) (per curiam) (Oregon's long-arm statute allows for jurisdiction over non-residents coextensive with due process requirements).

We do not consider documents and facts not presented to the district court. See United States v. Elias, 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990) ("Documents or facts not presented to the district court are not part of the record on appeal.").

Catibayan's motion to expedite is denied as moot.

Catibayan's motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Catibayan v. Sycip Gorres Velayo & Co.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jul 1, 2015
609 F. App'x 428 (9th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Catibayan v. Sycip Gorres Velayo & Co.

Case Details

Full title:CESAR Y. CATIBAYAN, a U.S. citizen, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SYCIP GORRES…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 1, 2015

Citations

609 F. App'x 428 (9th Cir. 2015)