Opinion
No. 3D22-1858
04-03-2024
Giasi Law, P.A., and Melissa A. Giasi and Erin M. Berger (Tampa), for appellant. Paul R. Pearcy, P.A., and Maureen G. Pearcy, for appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Vivianne Del Rio, Judge. Lower Tribunal No. 19-13864
Giasi Law, P.A., and Melissa A. Giasi and Erin M. Berger (Tampa), for appellant.
Paul R. Pearcy, P.A., and Maureen G. Pearcy, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, C.J., and EMAS and MILLER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Rodriguez v. Responsive Auto Ins. Co., 388 So.3d 846, 848-49 (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 9, 2023) (noting that under Florida’s " ‘new' summary judgment standard the trial court should only deny summary judgment where there is a genuine dispute as to a ‘material fact’ and ‘the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.’ ") (citing In re Amends. to Fla. Rule of Civ. Proc. 1.510 , 317 So. 3d 72, 75 (Fla. 2021)); Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Zamanillo, 388 So.3d 912 (Fla. 3d DCA, Jan. 17, 2024) (holding final summary judgment was properly entered where there was no tidable issue of fact on the record).