From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Casimiro v. Holder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 6, 2013
CASE NO. 13-01936 RS (N.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 13-01936 RS

05-06-2013

JOSELITO CASIMIRO, Plaintiff, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. ATTORNEY GENERAL, JANET NAPOLITANO, SECRETARY, DHS, JOHN MORTON, ASSISTANT SECRETARY USICE; TIMOTHY AIKEN, FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, USICE, Defendant.

MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) United States Attorney ALEX G. TSE (CABN 152348) Chief, Civil Division REBECCA A. FALK (CSBN 226798) Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Respondents KEVIN M. CRABTREE (CSBN 238162) Law Office of Robert L. Lewis Attorney for Petitioner


MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
ALEX G. TSE (CABN 152348)
Chief, Civil Division
REBECCA A. FALK (CSBN 226798)
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Respondents KEVIN M. CRABTREE (CSBN 238162)
Law Office of Robert L. Lewis
Attorney for Petitioner

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND

HEARING DATE


[PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 7-12]

Petitioner Joselito Casimiro ("Petitioner") and respondents Eric Holder, Jr., Janet Napolitano, John Morton and Timothy Aiken ("Respondents"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. On April 29, 2013, Petitioner filed a Petition For A Writ of Habeas Corpus claiming that his counsel failed to file a Ninth Circuit petition for review, including a Request for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Stay of Removal (Dkt. No. 1);

2. On the same day, this Court entered a temporary restraining order staying Petitioner's deportation (Dkt. No. 2);

3. On May 1, 2013, pursuant to this Court's Order, Respondents file a Return stating their position that this Court lacks jurisdiction over this matter (Dkt. No. 3);

4. On May 1, 2013, Petitioner filed an Amended Petition For A Writ of Habeas Corpus (Dkt. No. 5, 6);

5. On May 2, 2013 Petitioner filed a Motion to Stay Removal (Dkt. No. 7);

6. On May 2, 2013, the parties appeared for a hearing before this Court, at which time this Court requested briefing on Petitioner's Amended Petition For A Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion to Stay Removal, and that the parties agree on a hearing date;

7. The parties have agreed that Respondents will file their Return to Petitioner's Amended Petition For A Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion to Stay Removal (Dkt. No. 5, 6, 7) on May 29, 2013 and Petitioner will file his Traverse on June 12, 2013;

8. The parties have further agreed that this matter should be set for hearing with this Court on June 19, 2013 at 2 p.m.; and

9. Respondents agree that they will not remove Petitioner to the Philippines until after the hearing set for June 19, 2013.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Petitioner and Respondents that Respondents will file their Return to Petitioner's Amended Petition For A Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion to Stay Removal (Dkt. No. 5, 6, 7) on May 29, 2013 and Petitioner will file his Traverse on June 12, 2013 that this matter should be set for hearing with this Court on June 19, 2013 at 2 p.m.; and that Respondents will not remove Petitioner to the Philippines until after the hearing set for June 19, 2013.

Respectfully Submitted,

_______________

KEVIN M. CRABTREE

Attorney for Petitioner

Respectfully Submitted,

MELINDA HAAG

United States Attorney

_______________

REBECCA FALK

I, Rebecca A. Falk, hereby attest, in accordance with the Civil L.R. 5(i)(3), the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory listed here.

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Respondents

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Casimiro v. Holder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 6, 2013
CASE NO. 13-01936 RS (N.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Casimiro v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:JOSELITO CASIMIRO, Plaintiff, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. ATTORNEY GENERAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: May 6, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 13-01936 RS (N.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)