From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carrigan v. Alverson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 18, 2008
291 F. App'x 48 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-15754.

Submitted August 11, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed August 18, 2008.

Debra Carrigan, Las Vegas, NV, pro se.

Jonathan B. Owens, Karie N. Wilson, Alverson Taylor Mortensen Nelson Sanders, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 2:07-CV-00562-PMP-GWF.

Before: CANBY, LEAVY and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Appellant Debra Carrigan appeals the district court's judgment dismissing her case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. This court reviews the district court's order de novo, and we affirm. See Love v. United States, 915 F.2d 1242 (9th Cir. 1990); Gibson v. United States, 781 F.2d 1334, 1337 (9th Cir. 1986).

Our review of the record and of appellant's response to this court's order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Carrigan v. Alverson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 18, 2008
291 F. App'x 48 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Carrigan v. Alverson

Case Details

Full title:Debra CARRIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALVERSON TAYLOR MORTENSEN SANDERS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 18, 2008

Citations

291 F. App'x 48 (9th Cir. 2008)