From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carr v. McDowell

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Mar 16, 2023
21-cv-900-MMA (MSB) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2023)

Opinion

21-cv-900-MMA (MSB)

03-16-2023

PAUL D. CARR, Petitioner, v. NEIL MCDOWELL, et al., Respondents.


ORDER LIFTING STAY [DOC. NO. 28]

HON. MICHAEL M. ANELLO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On May 10, 2021, Petitioner Paul D. Carr, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Doc. No. 1 (the “Petition”). The Court initially dismissed the Petition with leave to amend, see Doc. No. 3, and thereafter granted Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, see Doc. No. 8, and extended Petitioner's deadline to file a First Amended Petition three times, see Doc. Nos. 8, 11, 13. On August 8, 2022, the Court stayed this action pursuant to Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005), to allow Petitioner to exhaust his claims in state court. See Doc. Nos. 22, 24. The Court directed Petitioner to file a status report every ninety (90) days, as well as a motion to lift the stay within thirty (30) days of a final decision by the California Supreme Court. Doc. No. 24 at 2.

Petitioner notified the Court that on October 13, 2022, he mailed a request for ruling to the California Supreme Court, see Doc. No. 25, and on November 21, 2022, he filed a notice of change of address, see Doc. No. 26. On December 14, 2022, Petitioner submitted a supplemental document, noting that he inadvertently failed to sign and submit a Page 16 to his First Amended Petition, see Doc. No. 27.

Plaintiff indicated in his supplemental filing that he mailed a First Amended Petition on December 8, 2022. See Doc. No. 27 at 2. The Court did not receive Petitioner's First Amended Petition until March 16 2023 as an attachment to his most recent filing

Petitioner has now filed a request for judicial notice, asking the Court to confirm its receipt of his First Amended Petition. See Doc. No. 28. The Court treats his request as a motion to lift the stay.

According to the First Amended Petition, attached to Petitioner's request, the California Supreme Court denied Petitioner's state court petition on November 22, 2022. Doc. No. 28 at 11. Accordingly, good cause appearing, the Court LIFTS the stay and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to reopen this case. Petitioner's First Amended Petition (Doc. No. 28), along with the supplemental document bearing Petitioner's signature (Doc. No. 27), will be filed as a separate entry on the docket. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to send Petitioner a copy of his First Amended Petition as filed along with a copy of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Carr v. McDowell

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Mar 16, 2023
21-cv-900-MMA (MSB) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2023)
Case details for

Carr v. McDowell

Case Details

Full title:PAUL D. CARR, Petitioner, v. NEIL MCDOWELL, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Mar 16, 2023

Citations

21-cv-900-MMA (MSB) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2023)