From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caplan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jan 3, 2020
No. 79892 (Nev. App. Jan. 3, 2020)

Opinion

No. 79892

01-03-2020

RICHARD LEVON CAPLAN, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; HEARING MASTER WESLEY YAMASHITA; AND THE HONORABLE WILLIAM S. POTTER, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and LENNY JORJORIAN; ARA JORJORIAN; AND MARGUERITE FOX, A/K/A MARGO FOX, Real Parties in Interest.


ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This original, emergency pro se petition for a writ of mandamus challenges the district court's, and particularly the probate commissioner's, reliance on notarized documents in a probate matter.

Having considered the petition and exhibits filed in this matter, we conclude that our extraordinary intervention is not warranted. See Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy, the consideration of which is within the court's discretion). In particular, petitioner has not pointed to a district court order ruling on the issues raised in this petition; instead, he appears to be attempting to collaterally attack the district court proceedings after the court denied his request to reopen the proceedings, which he may not do. See Archon Corp. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 133 Nev. 816, 825, 407 P.3d 702, 710 (2017) (explaining that a writ petition is not appropriate to argue issues that the district court has not addressed). Indeed, it appears that petitioner has filed an appeal from the order denying his petition to reopen, in which he may address his ability to contest the district court's decision below. See Caplan v. Jorjorian, Docket No. 77197; NRS 34.170; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004) (explaining that an appeal is an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

In light of this order, real parties in interest's motion to dismiss this petition is denied as moot.

/s/_________, C.J.

Gibbons

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Bulla cc: Hon. William S. Potter, District Judge, Family Court Division

Richard Levon Caplan

Ara Jorjorian

Cary Colt Payne

Marguerite Fox

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Caplan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jan 3, 2020
No. 79892 (Nev. App. Jan. 3, 2020)
Case details for

Caplan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD LEVON CAPLAN, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 3, 2020

Citations

No. 79892 (Nev. App. Jan. 3, 2020)