From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caine v. Hardy

U.S.
Mar 23, 1992
503 U.S. 936 (1992)

Summary

explaining the Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 101 S.Ct. 1908, 68 L.Ed.2d 420 / Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 104 S.Ct. 3194, 82 L.Ed.2d 393 doctrine

Summary of this case from McCormick v. Stalder

Opinion

No. 91-1007.

March 23, 1992, October TERM, 1991.


C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 943 F. 2d 1406.


Summaries of

Caine v. Hardy

U.S.
Mar 23, 1992
503 U.S. 936 (1992)

explaining the Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 101 S.Ct. 1908, 68 L.Ed.2d 420 / Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 104 S.Ct. 3194, 82 L.Ed.2d 393 doctrine

Summary of this case from McCormick v. Stalder

containing rationale for dismissal of Foxx's complaint

Summary of this case from Foxx v. Dalton
Case details for

Caine v. Hardy

Case Details

Full title:CAINE v. HARDY ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 23, 1992

Citations

503 U.S. 936 (1992)

Citing Cases

In re Enron Corp. Sec., Derivative "ERISA" Litigation

(and cases cited therein). See also Schatz v. Rosenberg, 943 F.2d 485 (4th Cir. 1991) (analysis applicable to…

Xie v. Sakura Kai I Inc.

Herman v. RSR Sec. Services Ltd., 172 F.3d 132, 142 (2d Cir. 1999) (emphasis added); see also Reich, 121 F.3d…