From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cadalin v. Geary

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Mar 9, 2006
No. 02-05-444-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 9, 2006)

Opinion

No. 02-05-444-CV

Delivered: March 9, 2006.

Appeal from the 67th District Court of Tarrant County.

Panel D: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellant attempts to appeal from a trial court order granting a partial summary judgment in favor of appellee. On January 4, 2006, we notified appellant that we were concerned that this court may not have jurisdiction over this appeal because the order granting summary judgment is a partial summary judgment that does not dispose of all parties in the case; thus, it does not appear to be a final, appealable order or an appealable interlocutory order. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014 (Vernon Supp. 2005); Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 192-93 (Tex. 2001). We stated that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal on or before January 17, 2006. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.3(a). We have not received any response.

Because there is no final judgment or appealable interlocutory order, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).


Summaries of

Cadalin v. Geary

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Mar 9, 2006
No. 02-05-444-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 9, 2006)
Case details for

Cadalin v. Geary

Case Details

Full title:CADALIN, LLC, Appellant, v. GEARY, PORTER DONOVAN, P.C., Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Mar 9, 2006

Citations

No. 02-05-444-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 9, 2006)