From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cabrera v. Culpepper

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Nov 19, 2009
Case No. 3:09cv483/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Nov. 19, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09cv483/MCR/EMT.

November 19, 2009


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated November 3, 2009. (Doc. 4). Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Petitioner's "Motion to Compel 28 U.S.C. § 1361," construed as a petition for writ of mandamus (doc. 1), is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

DONE AND ORDERED


Summaries of

Cabrera v. Culpepper

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Nov 19, 2009
Case No. 3:09cv483/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Nov. 19, 2009)
Case details for

Cabrera v. Culpepper

Case Details

Full title:PEDRO O. CABRERA, Petitioner, v. SAM CULPEPPER, WARDEN; WALTER A. McNEIL…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Nov 19, 2009

Citations

Case No. 3:09cv483/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Nov. 19, 2009)

Citing Cases

Calleja-Zarate v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement

8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(4)(D). See, e.g., Orozco, 911 F.2d at 541 (petitioner had no private right of action to…