From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bustamonte v. Koval

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 12, 1983
98 A.D.2d 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

December 12, 1983


In a medical malpractice action, defendant Raymond Koval appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bellard, J.), dated March 15, 1983, which denied his motion for summary judgment in his favor based on plaintiff's failure to timely serve a bill of particulars pursuant to a prior conditional order of preclusion. Order reversed, on the law, with costs, and motion for summary judgment dismissing the action as against defendant Koval granted. Plaintiff has failed to establish the legal merits of this action by an affidavit from a physician competent to attest to the meritorious nature of his claim (see Amodeo v. Radler, 89 A.D.2d 594, affd 59 N.Y.2d 1001; Smith v. Lefrak Organization, 60 N.Y.2d 828; Lee v. Moley, 97 A.D.2d 787). Mollen, P.J., Weinstein, Brown and Boyers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bustamonte v. Koval

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 12, 1983
98 A.D.2d 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Bustamonte v. Koval

Case Details

Full title:MIGUEL BUSTAMONTE, Respondent, v. RAYMOND KOVAL, Appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 12, 1983

Citations

98 A.D.2d 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

YB v. Carey

Conclusory vague contrived protestations not relevant nor material to overcome the burden to defeat judgement…

Weston-Pinillos v. Seaview Manor, LLC

Opposition must "produce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to require a trial of material…