From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burgess v. Long Island Railroad Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 16, 1991
172 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

April 16, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.).


Plaintiff seeks to recover monetary damages for personal injuries he allegedly sustained on September 2, 1988 when he fell after disembarking from a Long Island Railroad train near the Amagansett Station. Although a notice of claim was served on November 22, 1988, the summons and complaint were not served upon the Long Island Railroad Authority until October 3, 1989.

The effective statute of limitations for actions in tort against the Long Island Railroad has repeatedly been held to be one year and thirty days after the occurrence of the alleged accident. (Public Authorities Law § 1276, [2], [6]; Andersen v. Long Is. R.R., 59 N.Y.2d 657, rearg denied 60 N.Y.2d 586.)

Plaintiff nevertheless claims entitlement to a three day extension of the limitations period merely because the accident occurred on a Friday evening, thereby allegedly preventing the plaintiff from presenting his claim until the offices of the Long Island Railroad Authority reopened on the following Monday morning. General Construction Law § 25-a (1) specifically provides, however, that an extension of the limitations period is permitted only when the limitations period "ends on a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday", rather than commencing thereon. Moreover, it is well settled that a cause of action for personal injuries accrues, for purposes of calculating the statute of limitations, on the date of the accident (Victorson v. Bock Laundry Mach. Co., 37 N.Y.2d 395, 399).

We therefore find that the plaintiff has failed to establish any entitlement to a period of limitations greater than one year and thirty days and has failed to establish any conduct on the part of defendant Long Island Railroad Authority, or its agents, that would estop said defendant from interposing the defense of the statute of limitations (Penner v. National R.R. Passenger Corp., 98 A.D.2d 631).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Asch and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

Burgess v. Long Island Railroad Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 16, 1991
172 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Burgess v. Long Island Railroad Authority

Case Details

Full title:DEREK BURGESS, Appellant, v. LONG ISLAND RAILROAD AUTHORITY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 16, 1991

Citations

172 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
568 N.Y.S.2d 385

Citing Cases

Vargas v. MTA Bus Co.

The Transit Defendants' argument that plaintiff failed to serve a notice of claim upon them is unavailing.…

Sapini v. Ferrara

Because Metro-North Commuter Railroad is a subsidiary corporation of the MTA, a notice of claim is not…