From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bunker v. Testa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1996
234 A.D.2d 1004 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Summary

refusing to dismiss claim where the defendant allegedly yelled and gestured obscenely at plaintiff, followed her home, refused to leave the premises, followed her children and family around, and told her that he knew where the children went to school and when they got out of school

Summary of this case from Reyes v. Fairfield Props.

Opinion

December 30, 1996.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Present — Denman, P.J., Lawton, Fallon, Doerr and Balio, JJ.


Supreme Court properly dismissed the harassment cause of action. "[W]here severe mental pain or anguish is inflicted through a deliberate and malicious campaign of harassment or intimidation, a remedy is available in the form of an action for the intentional infliction of emotional distress" ( Nader v General Motors Corp., 25 NY2d 560, 569).

The court also properly dismissed the assault cause of action. Taking plaintiffs' allegations as true, as we must ( see, Morone v Morone, 50 NY2d 481, 484), no cause of action for assault has been stated because the actions complained of did not cause an" "imminent apprehension' of `harmful or offensive contact'" ( Hayes v Schultz, 150 AD2d 522, 523).

Finally, the court properly refused to dismiss the causes of action alleging intentional infliction of emotional distress and a derivative loss of services to plaintiff William Cadwallader. Contrary to defendant's assertions, the complaint alleges intentional acts by defendant, including yelling and gesturing obscenely at plaintiff Anne E. Bunker, following her home, refusing to leave the premises, following her children and family around and telling her that he knew where the children went to school and when they got out of school. Those alleged acts constitute conduct so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community" `" ( Howell v New York Post Co., 81 NY2d 115, 122). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Corning, J."Dismiss Causes of Action.)


Summaries of

Bunker v. Testa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1996
234 A.D.2d 1004 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

refusing to dismiss claim where the defendant allegedly yelled and gestured obscenely at plaintiff, followed her home, refused to leave the premises, followed her children and family around, and told her that he knew where the children went to school and when they got out of school

Summary of this case from Reyes v. Fairfield Props.

requiring a "deliberate and malicious campaign of harassment or intimidation"

Summary of this case from Hodge v. Hodge
Case details for

Bunker v. Testa

Case Details

Full title:ANNE E. BUNKER et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. SAM TESTA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1996

Citations

234 A.D.2d 1004 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
652 N.Y.S.2d 181

Citing Cases

Zheng v. Rivera

In the authority cited by plaintiff, courts declined to dismiss claims where the plaintiff's alleged repeated…

Tompkins v. Jackson

Assault and Battery An assault is the intentional placing of another in apprehension of imminent harmful or…