From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brunson v. Streeter

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Hattiesburg Division
Dec 18, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09cv210-KS-MTP (S.D. Miss. Dec. 18, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09cv210-KS-MTP.

December 18, 2009


ORDER


THIS MATTER is before the court on a Motion [16] to Vacate and the Right to Confront his Accuser [16] filed by Petitioner. In this motion, it appears that Petitioner is requesting that certain individuals be called as witnesses in this matter. It is not clear how these individuals would have information relevant to the claims asserted by Petitioner in his habeas petition. At any rate, this motion is premature. There is presently pending before the court a Motion [15] to Dismiss Pursuant to § 2244(d) filed by Respondents. Accordingly, until the court rules on the Motion to Dismiss and determines whether Petitioner's habeas petition should be reviewed on its merits, Petitioner's instant request is moot.

Although there is no rule, per se, allowing the calling of witnesses in a habeas proceeding, the court liberally construes Petitioner's motion as requesting an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Rule 8 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion [16] to Vacate and the Right to Confront his Accuser is denied.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.


Summaries of

Brunson v. Streeter

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Hattiesburg Division
Dec 18, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09cv210-KS-MTP (S.D. Miss. Dec. 18, 2009)
Case details for

Brunson v. Streeter

Case Details

Full title:JERRY BRUNSON PETITIONER v. J.J. STREETER and JIM HOOD RESPONDENTS

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Hattiesburg Division

Date published: Dec 18, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09cv210-KS-MTP (S.D. Miss. Dec. 18, 2009)