From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brundage v. Proctor

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Feb 23, 1940
304 Ill. App. 253 (Ill. App. Ct. 1940)

Opinion

Gen. No. 40,817. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed February 23, 1940

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS, § 337accommodation maker, insufficiency of evidence. In action on judgment notes where one signer testified that he did not sign the notes to accommodate the payee, whom he did not know at that time, it could not be contended that absence of consideration and other transactions showed such maker to be an accommodation maker for the payee, and such defense was not available in action on the notes by the payee.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from Municipal Court of Chicago; Hon. JOHN T. ZURIS, presiding.

Judgment of the municipal court reversed. Judgment here affirming judgments by confession entered by the municipal court of Chicago in the separate actions on March 23, 1937, in the respective amounts of $834.22 and $2,488.98. Heard in second division, first district, at October term, 1939.

McNab, Holmes Long, for appellant;

Wallace B. Kemp, of counsel;

Wm.E. McNamara, for appellee.


"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed February 23, 1940.


Summaries of

Brundage v. Proctor

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Feb 23, 1940
304 Ill. App. 253 (Ill. App. Ct. 1940)
Case details for

Brundage v. Proctor

Case Details

Full title:Avery Brundage, Appellant, v. E. C. Proctor and Harvey Farrington. Harvey…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Feb 23, 1940

Citations

304 Ill. App. 253 (Ill. App. Ct. 1940)
26 N.E.2d 156