From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 5, 1921
90 So. 54 (Ala. Crim. App. 1921)

Opinion

8 Div. 827.

April 5, 1921

Appeal from Morgan County Court; W.T. Lowe, Judge.

Fred Brown was convicted of carrying a concealed weapon, and appeals. Reversed and remanded.

S.A. Lynne, of Decatur, for appellant.

Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.

Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.


On the trial of this case in the court below the state introduced only one witness, T.W. McCuthra, and upon the testimony of this witness relied for a conviction. On cross-examination of this witness the court would not allow the defendant to prove that the witness had pecuniary interest in the result of the trial and in the conviction of this defendant. This ruling was error and in direct conflict with the general rule which provides that on cross-examination of a witness any fact may be elicited which tends to show bias or partiality; the purpose of the rule being that, if the witness is interested in the result of the trial, the jury may weigh his testimony in the light of such interest. It matters not if the interest so shown is based upon hatred or friendship, or upon financial or other reasons. 376, and cases cited. See, also, John Byrd v. State, 17 Ala. App. 301, 84 So. 777.

Ante, p. 67.

Reversed and remanded


Summaries of

Brown v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 5, 1921
90 So. 54 (Ala. Crim. App. 1921)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:BROWN v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Apr 5, 1921

Citations

90 So. 54 (Ala. Crim. App. 1921)
18 Ala. App. 91

Citing Cases

Layton v. State

Frank B. Embry, of Pell City, for appellant. Charge 4, refused to defendant, should have been given. Shepard…

Shepard v. State

Its refusal therefore was error. Brown v. State, 18 Ala. App. 91, 90 So. 54; Byrd v. State, 17 Ala. App. 301,…