From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. James

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 12, 2006
Civil No. 4:CV-03-0631 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 12, 2006)

Opinion

Civil No. 4:CV-03-0631.

June 12, 2006


ORDER


Background

Victor Brown, an inmate presently confined at the State Correctional Institution, Frackville, Pennsylvania, filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Presently pending is Plaintiff's motion to compel discovery and for sanctions. See Record document no. 92.

Brown's motion states that he served counsel for the Defendants with a request for production of documents and interrogatories on June 8, 2004. Thereafter, he agreed to multiple requests by opposing counsel for additional time in which to submit responses . However, as of October 28, 2005, Defendants had still not purportedly provided him with responses to his discovery requests. In addition, Plaintiff asks that Defendants be required to pay attorney's fees as a sanction for their prolonged non-disclosure.

The Defendants have not submitted an opposing brief to Plaintiff's motion, nor have they requested an enlargement of time in which to file a response. Accordingly, the motion to compel will be deemed unopposed. The unopposed motion will be granted and the Defendants, if they have not already done so, are directed to file responses to Plaintiff's outstanding discovery requests within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. Any request by Defendants for additional time in which to comply with this Order will only be granted upon a showing of exceptional circumstances.

With respect to the Plaintiff's request that Defendants be sanctioned and ordered to pay attorney's fees, it is well settled that pro se litigants are not permitted to recover attorney's fees. See Kay v. Ehrler, 499 U.S. 432 (1991). Brown's request to be awarded attorney's fees will be denied. Consequently,

With respect to the issue of sanctions, Plaintiff indicates that due to their untimeliness, Defendants have agreed not to require him to pay photocopying expenses for copies of any documents he has requested.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff's unopposed motion to compel discovery (Record document no. 92) is granted in part.
2. Within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order, Defendants, if they have not already done so, shall file responses to Plaintiff's outstanding discovery requests.
3. Plaintiff's request to be awarded attorney fees from the Defendants as a sanction for their delay in providing discovery is denied.


Summaries of

Brown v. James

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 12, 2006
Civil No. 4:CV-03-0631 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 12, 2006)
Case details for

Brown v. James

Case Details

Full title:VICTOR BROWN, Plaintiff v. THOMAS JAMES, ET AL., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 12, 2006

Citations

Civil No. 4:CV-03-0631 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 12, 2006)