From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 6, 2001
789 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 2D01-1848

Opinion filed July 6, 2001.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P.9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Dennis P. Maloney, Judge.


Errol D. Brooks challenges the trial court's order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). This court is unable to review the trial court's denial of the motion because Brooks' motion is not included in the record on appeal, and the clerk of the circuit court can find no record of Brooks' motion.

The trial court's order specifically states that it is considering Brooks' motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to rule 3.800(a), filed on March 8, 2001. Because of the specificity of the trial court's order, this court does not question whether Brooks actually filed a motion with the trial court.

Because we cannot review the matter without an adequate record, we affirm the trial court's order. Since the lack of an adequate record is due to no fault of Brooks, our affirmance is without prejudice to Brooks' right to file a renewed motion pursuant to rule 3.800(a) raising the same grounds within thirty days from the date of the mandate. Such motion shall not be considered successive. See Brown v. State, Case No. 2D01-1824, ___ So.2d ___, 2001 WL 717528 (Fla. 2d DCA June 27, 2001).

Affirmed.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and STRINGER, J., and CAMPBELL, MONTEREY, (SENIOR) JUDGE, Concur.


Summaries of

Brooks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 6, 2001
789 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Brooks v. State

Case Details

Full title:ERROL D. BROOKS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 6, 2001

Citations

789 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Planells v. State

Such motion shall not be considered successive. See Brooks v. State, 789 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).…

Lenoir v. State

Such motion shall not be considered successive. See Brooks v. State, 789 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).…