From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bromberg v. Morton V. Ellish, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 28, 1985
107 A.D.2d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

January 28, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Stolarik, J.).


Order affirmed, with costs.

Upon a review of the record, we find that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendants' motion (CPLR 6514, subd [c]) for costs and expenses occasioned by the filing by plaintiffs, and subsequent cancellation by the court, of a notice of pendency. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bromberg v. Morton V. Ellish, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 28, 1985
107 A.D.2d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Bromberg v. Morton V. Ellish, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT BROMBERG et al., Respondents, v. MORTON V. ELLISH, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 28, 1985

Citations

107 A.D.2d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Merch. Acquisitions v. Difficile Realty Corp. (In re Sun Prop. Consultants)

Hulko, 1990 WL 139022, at *4. "If the trial court has discretion to disallow costs and expenses entirely,…

Josefsson v. Keller

The defendant Keller did not exercise his option in accordance with the terms thereof, and, therefore, in the…