Opinion
January 28, 1985
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Stolarik, J.).
Order affirmed, with costs.
Upon a review of the record, we find that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendants' motion (CPLR 6514, subd [c]) for costs and expenses occasioned by the filing by plaintiffs, and subsequent cancellation by the court, of a notice of pendency. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.