From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brodlie v. Fink

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 31, 1949
275 App. Div. 1061 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

October 31, 1949.


In an action to recover damages for breach of contract of employment, order denying defendant's motion, under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for judgment on the pleadings, reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. The contract being within the Statute of Frauds, parol evidence is inadmissible to supply any of its essential terms. Johnston, Acting P.J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brodlie v. Fink

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 31, 1949
275 App. Div. 1061 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

Brodlie v. Fink

Case Details

Full title:BEN BRODLIE, Respondent, v. SIDNEY FINK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 31, 1949

Citations

275 App. Div. 1061 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Citing Cases

Resnick v. Keystone Sportswear

Thus, according to the plaintiff, the consideration for the guarantee was his oral promise, definite in every…

Miller v. Burlington Mills Ribbon Corp.

         In an action for damages based upon the alleged wrongful dismissal of respondent in breach of a…