Opinion
06-23-00124-CR
02-02-2024
JAMES H. BROCKMAN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Do Not Publish
Submitted: January 2, 2024
On Appeal from the 102nd District Court Bowie County, Texas Trial Court No. 21F1073-102
Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Scott E. Stevens Chief Justice
Pursuant to a plea bargain, James H. Brockman pled guilty to theft of property of a value under $2,500.00, with two prior theft convictions. The trial court found Brockman guilty, sentenced him to two years' confinement in state jail, suspended his sentence, and placed him on community supervision for a period of five years. Brockman was also assessed a fine of $2,000.00, court costs of $290.00, reimbursement fees of $260.00, and restitution of $852.48.
See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 31.03(e)(4)(D) (Supp.).
Less than two years later, Brockman's community supervision was revoked after he pled true to the State's allegations that he violated the terms of his community supervision in six ways. The trial court sentenced him to two years' confinement in state jail and assessed him a fine of $2,000.00, court costs of $290.00, reimbursement fees of $260.00, and restitution of $852.48.
In this appeal, Brockman challenges the assessment of reimbursement fees because (1) they are not supported by the most current bill of costs and (2) there is insufficient evidence to support the assessment of his court-appointed attorney fees. As Brockman acknowledges, $250.00 of the assessed reimbursement fees were for court-appointed attorney fees.
In our cause numbers 06-23-00122-CR and 06-23-00123-CR, Brockman appeals two other convictions for theft of property of a value under $2,500.00, with two prior theft convictions.
Brockman raised identical issues and made virtually identical arguments in the appeal of another theft conviction, which we addressed in our opinion in cause number 06-23-00122-CR. Because these issues are identical to those addressed in that opinion, we overrule these issues for the reasons stated in that opinion.
We affirm the trial court's judgment.