From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bright v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo
Aug 22, 2003
No. 07-03-0079-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 22, 2003)

Opinion

No. 07-03-0079-CR.

August 22, 2003. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appeal from the 137th District Court of Lubbock County; No. 16,336; Honorable Cecil G. Puryear, Judge.

PANEL E: REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ, and BOYD, S.J.

John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 75.002(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2003).


Appellant brought this appeal from an order of the trial court denying his motion for appointment of counsel pursuant to Chapter 64 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to aid him in his proceeding seeking DNA testing. On May 29, 2003, this court entered its order abating the appeal and remanding the matter to the trial court for the purpose of determining if appellant was indigent and thus entitled to the furnishing of a clerk's record and the appointment of an attorney. We have been advised that the trial court has now found appellant to be indigent and appointed an attorney to represent him on the DNA application. Thus, the relief for which appellant sought and was initially denied, has now been afforded him. This appeal has now become moot. Accordingly, the appeal is now reinstated and because of its mootness, must be, and is hereby, dismissed.


Summaries of

Bright v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo
Aug 22, 2003
No. 07-03-0079-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 22, 2003)
Case details for

Bright v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES WARREN BRIGHT, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo

Date published: Aug 22, 2003

Citations

No. 07-03-0079-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 22, 2003)