From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bridgewater v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Oct 14, 2004
No. 2-04-409-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 14, 2004)

Opinion

No. 2-04-409-CR

Delivered: October 14, 2004. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b).

Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 1 of Tarrant County.

Panel D: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

See Tex.R.App.P. 47.4.


Appellant Anthony Bridgewater appeals from the trial court's interlocutory order denying his motion to suppress. The denial of a motion to suppress may not be appealed until after the final judgment is entered. McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). No final judgment has been entered in this case. Because we were concerned that we had no jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal, we sent a letter to appellant on September 14, 2004, requesting a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, as it appeared we lacked jurisdiction. We received no response. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex.R.App.P. 43.2(f).


Summaries of

Bridgewater v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Oct 14, 2004
No. 2-04-409-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 14, 2004)
Case details for

Bridgewater v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY BRIDGEWATER Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS State

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Oct 14, 2004

Citations

No. 2-04-409-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 14, 2004)