From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Breakman v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jun 8, 2011
373 P.3d 898 (Nev. 2011)

Opinion

No. 58106.

06-08-2011

Antonio Michael BREAKMAN, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Antonio Michael Breakman Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney


Antonio Michael Breakman

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a proper person petition for extraordinary relief. Petitioner challenges the validity of his judgment of conviction and sentence. We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. A challenge to the validity of the judgment of conviction must be raised in a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court in the first instance. NRS 34.724(2)(b) ; NRS 34.738(1). Accordingly, we

We express no opinion as to whether petitioner could meet the procedural requirements of NRS chapter 34.

ORDER the petition DENIED.


Summaries of

Breakman v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jun 8, 2011
373 P.3d 898 (Nev. 2011)
Case details for

Breakman v. State

Case Details

Full title:Antonio Michael BREAKMAN, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Jun 8, 2011

Citations

373 P.3d 898 (Nev. 2011)