From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Braunstein v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 8, 2002
294 A.D.2d 323 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-02326

Argued March 21, 2002.

May 8, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Joseph, J.), entered February 15, 2001, which, upon the granting of the motion of the defendant Town of Hempstead pursuant to CPLR 4401 to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it at the close of the plaintiffs' evidence, dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Parker Waichman, P.C. (DiJoseph Portegello, P.C., New York, N.Y. [Arnold E. DiJoseph III] of counsel), for appellants.

Rivkin Radler, LLP, Uniondale, N.Y. (Evan H. Krinick and Cheryl F. Korman of counsel), for respondent.

Before: SANTUCCI, J.P., FLORIO, SMITH, SCHMIDT, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the defendant Town of Hempstead (hereinafter the Town) pursuant to CPLR 4401 to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it. There is no rational process by which the factfinder could base a finding in favor of the plaintiffs (see Szczerbiak v. Pilat, 90 N.Y.2d 553). The plaintiffs failed to establish that the Town had prior written notice of the defective condition, or that the Town created the condition by an affirmative act of negligence or that its use of the property constituted a special use for the benefit of the Town (see Benincasa v. Village of Irvington, 290 A.D.2d 406; ITT Hartford Ins. Co. v. Village of Ossining, 257 A.D.2d 606). The catch basin in question did not fall within the special use exception to the prior written notice requirement as its drainage function provided proper maintenance of a safe roadway and served no municipal function inuring to the special benefit of the Town (see Vise v. County of Suffolk, 207 A.D.2d 341; Barnes v. City of Mount Vernon, 245 A.D.2d 407).

Contrary to the plaintiffs' remaining contention, "constructive notice of a defect may not overide the statutory requirement of prior written notice to the municipality" (Henrickson v. City of New York, 285 A.D.2d 529; see Amabile v. City of Buffalo, 93 N.Y.2d 471).

SANTUCCI, J.P., FLORIO, SMITH and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Braunstein v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 8, 2002
294 A.D.2d 323 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Braunstein v. County of Nassau

Case Details

Full title:SHIRLEE BRAUNSTEIN, et al., appellants, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 8, 2002

Citations

294 A.D.2d 323 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
741 N.Y.S.2d 565

Citing Cases

Ramos v. City of N.Y

The plaintiff's contention that the City made special use of the street is improperly raised for the first…

Odell v. Town of Riverhead

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the plaintiffs' complaint in which the only remaining cause of action…