From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vise v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 1, 1994
207 A.D.2d 341 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

August 1, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

On February 19, 1985, the plaintiff was injured on a Town of Babylon roadway when she fell after stepping into an eroded area abutting a catch basin or sewer cover. Town Code of Babylon § 158-1 provides that "[n]o civil action shall be maintained against the Town * * * for damages or injuries to person * * * sustained by reason of any highway * * * being defective * * * unless written notice of such defective * * * condition * * * was actually given to the Town Clerk or the Superintendent of Highways." Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the erosion complained of constituted a defective condition within the meaning of the Town Code and, thus, the notice requirement applies here. Moreover, the record is devoid of any indication that the Town had received prior written notice of the defective condition prior to the plaintiff's accident.

Furthermore, this case does not fall within the recognized exceptions to the notice requirement. The record indicates the erosion of the roadway around the catch basin was not caused by the Town but, rather, was the result of natural causes (see, Michela v. County of Nassau, 176 A.D.2d 707). Similarly, the plaintiff's claim does not fall within the special use exception to the subject notice requirement (see, Giacotto v. New York City Tr. Auth., 150 Misc.2d 164, 168), in that the drainage function of the catch basin served to provide for the proper maintenance of a safe roadway and, thus, served no municipal function inuring to the special benefit of the Town (see, Giacotto v. New York City Tr. Auth., supra, at 164; see also, Marona v. Incorporated Vil. of Mamaroneck, 203 A.D.2d 337; Poirier v. City of Schenectady, 201 A.D.2d 845; Waters v. Town of Hempstead, 166 A.D.2d 584, 586). Ritter, J.P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vise v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 1, 1994
207 A.D.2d 341 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Vise v. County of Suffolk

Case Details

Full title:CLAIRE VISE, Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, Defendant, and TOWN OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 1, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 341 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
615 N.Y.S.2d 429

Citing Cases

Szilagy v. Town of Smithtown

Moreover, "the affirmative negligence exception to the notice requirement [is] limited to work by the…

Silva v. City of New York

The plaintiffs' reliance on another exception to the written notice requirement based on a condition caused…