Opinion
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RE MOTION TO DISMISS [Doc. 5, 8]
LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.
Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se on a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2241. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. Pending before the court is Respondent's motion to dismiss.
On February 15, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein. These findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Petitioner did not file objections.
The court notes that the copy of the findings and recommendations served on Petitioner was returned by the United States Postal Service. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(f), service on a party at their address of record is fully effective
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist. , 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on February 15, 2007, are a adopted in full;
2. Respondent's motion to dismiss is GRANTED;
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed as moot;
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for Respondent and to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.