Opinion
No. 62492
07-23-2013
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE
This is a proper person appeal from a district court order denying a motion to change venue. Ninth Judicial District Court, Douglas County; David R. Gamble, Judge.
Having considered appellant's appeal statement and the record on appeal, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant's motion to change venue from Douglas County to Carson City, as appellant did not produce any evidence demonstrating that the convenience of the witnesses compels a change of venue or that transferring the proceedings to Carson City would promote the ends of justice. See Roethlisberger v. McNulty, 127 Nov. _____, _____, 256 P.3d 955, 957 (2011) (explaining that this court reviews a district court's denial of a motion to change venue based on the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice for an abuse of discretion).
Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
______, J.
Hardesty
______, J.
Parraguirre
______, J.
Cherry
cc: Ninth Judicial District Court Dept.
Jessica Branco
Curtiss Elliot
Douglas County Court Clerk