Opinion
6:15-CV-01454-PK
09-21-2016
PATRICIA G. BOWLIN, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant.
ORDER
BROWN, Judge.
Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation (#15) on August 18, 2016, in which he recommends the Court affirm the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's application for supplemental security income benefits and dismiss this matter with prejudice. Plaintiff filed timely Objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9 Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9 Cir. 2003)(en banc).
In her Objections Plaintiff reiterates the arguments contained in her Opening Brief and Reply. This Court has carefully considered Plaintiff's Objections and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. The Court also has reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation (#15). Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner and DISMISSES this matter with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 21st day of September, 2016.
/s/ Anna J. Brown
ANNA J. BROWN
United States District Judge