From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowers v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Nov 7, 2022
351 So. 3d 631 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

Case No. 5D22-730

11-07-2022

Jacqueline BOWERS, Appellant, v. Harold N. SMITH, Appellee.

William S. Graessle, of William S. Graessle, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant. Meaghan K. Marro, of Marro Law, P.A., Plantation, for Appellee.


William S. Graessle, of William S. Graessle, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Meaghan K. Marro, of Marro Law, P.A., Plantation, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Former Wife appeals an order rendered February 8, 2022, suspending her timesharing. On appeal, Former Wife argues, inter alia , that this order is in error because it granted relief not requested by Former Husband, citing Golden v. Bass , 194 So. 3d 1080, 1082 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016). We agree and therefore reverse this order.

This Court has jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iii)(b).

We affirm the order transferring venue without further discussion. AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

EVANDER, WALLIS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bowers v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Nov 7, 2022
351 So. 3d 631 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Bowers v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:Jacqueline BOWERS, Appellant, v. Harold N. SMITH, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Nov 7, 2022

Citations

351 So. 3d 631 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)