From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borrovic v. Attorney General of the U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jul 5, 2011
435 F. App'x 144 (3d Cir. 2011)

Summary

emphasizing that "a formal claim against the policy or suit by [a claimant] was not required"

Summary of this case from AmGuard Ins. Co. v. SG Patel & Sons II LLC

Opinion

No. 10-1305.

July 5, 2011.

Present: FUENTES, VANASKIE and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges.


SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING


The Petition for Panel Rehearing filed by the Appellant in the above-entitled matter, having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court is hereby GRANTED. The opinion and judgment entered May 11, 2011 are hereby vacated.

The Clerk is instructed to reinstate the appeal in No. 10-1305. The matter will be submitted to the next available merits panel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Borrovic v. Attorney General of the U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jul 5, 2011
435 F. App'x 144 (3d Cir. 2011)

emphasizing that "a formal claim against the policy or suit by [a claimant] was not required"

Summary of this case from AmGuard Ins. Co. v. SG Patel & Sons II LLC
Case details for

Borrovic v. Attorney General of the U.S.

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN ALEJANDRO GUTIERREZ BORROVIC, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Jul 5, 2011

Citations

435 F. App'x 144 (3d Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

U.S. Life Ins. Co. v. Holtzman

The interpleader statute grants district courts original jurisdiction if certain requirements are met. See…

Del. Life Ins. Co. v. Short

Since Craig denies that Delaware Life "remains subject to competing claims" (D.I. 3 Answer ¶ 18) and alleges…