Opinion
NO. 02-11-00193-CR
03-15-2012
RODNEY ALLEN BOORTZ APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
A jury convicted Appellant Rodney Allen Boortz of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon and assessed his punishment at fifteen years' confinement for the aggravated assault and ten years' confinement for unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon. The trial court sentenced him accordingly and ordered the sentences to be served concurrently. Appellant brings a single point on appeal complaining of charge error.
At trial, Appellant objected to the proposed jury charge. After changes were made, the trial court asked if the parties requested any other changes to the charge. Appellant's counsel stated, "[I]t looks like the charge reflects those changes that I requested."
A party may not complain on appeal that he was given the jury charge he requested. The invited error rule prohibits a party from succeeding in having a claimed jury charge error reviewed by a higher court in hopes of reversal when (1) that party requested the jury charge, and the charge was given or (2) the party affirmatively and successfully argued that the trial court include or exclude a portion of the charge.
Prystash v. State, 3 S.W.3d 522, 531 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1102 (2000).
Wileford v. State, 72 S.W.3d 820, 823 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2002, pet. ref'd).
--------
We therefore overrule Appellant's sole point and affirm the trial court's judgment.
LEE ANN DAUPHINOT
JUSTICE
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)