From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boone v. Supermarkets General Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 11, 1985
109 A.D.2d 771 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

March 11, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kunzeman, J.).


Order dated July 5, 1984, affirmed, insofar as reviewed.

Respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

Upon review of the record, we conclude that Special Term did not abuse its discretion by allowing disclosure of investigation reports concerning other "slip-and-fall" accidents that occurred in defendant's supermarket during the five years prior to the date the injured plaintiff allegedly slipped and fell in the store ( see, Mott v. Chesebro-Whitman Co., 87 A.D.2d 573; Abrams v Vaughan Bushnell Mfg. Co., 37 A.D.2d 833). Mollen, P.J., Titone, Thompson and Bracken, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Boone v. Supermarkets General Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 11, 1985
109 A.D.2d 771 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Boone v. Supermarkets General Corporation

Case Details

Full title:ESTHER BOONE et al., Respondents, v. SUPERMARKETS GENERAL CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 11, 1985

Citations

109 A.D.2d 771 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Jack Hardy v. Tops Markets

Similarly, defendant's maintenance and inspection records in effect on the date of the accident are also…