From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mott v. Chesebro-Whitman Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1982
87 A.D.2d 573 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

March 1, 1982


In this products liability, negligence and breach of warranty action, the defendant manufacturer appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leviss, J.), dated January 8, 1981, which denied its motion for a protective order to vacate plaintiffs' notice for discovery and inspection, and directed said defendant to furnish to the plaintiffs certain items. Order modified, by deleting therefrom the paragraph beginning with the word "Defendant" and ending with the word "entry", and substituting therefor the following: "Defendant Chesebro-Whitman Company is directed to furnish plaintiffs with all necessary and relevant records, documents, memoranda and reports with respect to similar claims or the title and index number of litigation arising out of any negligence or defects with respect to the failure of wooden rungs upon the `Gold Medal' and/or `Suburban Extension Ladders' manufactured by this defendant at its plant located at Newark Valley, New York, for the period from 1960, up to and including the date of the occurrence, and any modification in the design specifications for this type of ladder during said period are also directed to be produced." As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements ( Pataki v. Kiseda, 80 A.D.2d 100; Abrams v. Vaughan Bushnell Mfg. Co., 37 A.D.2d 833). Damiani, J.P., Mangano, Weinstein and Bracken, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mott v. Chesebro-Whitman Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1982
87 A.D.2d 573 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Mott v. Chesebro-Whitman Company

Case Details

Full title:MURIEL L. MOTT, as Executrix of DONALD T. MOTT, Deceased, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1982

Citations

87 A.D.2d 573 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

Zimmerman v. New York City Transit Authority

The theory of plaintiff's cause of action, as amplified by her bill of particulars, was that the R-46 subway…

Williamsville v. Cannon Partnership

Accordingly, discovery should be limited to documents concerning the nature and development of Celotex's…