From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bolden v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Dec 2, 2022
No. 5D22-1435 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 2, 2022)

Opinion

5D22-1435

12-02-2022

JOHNTEL DUWAYNE BOLDEN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Allison A. Havens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah A. Chance, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, LT Case No. 2020-305477-CFDB, James R. Clayton, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Allison A. Havens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah A. Chance, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentences imposed by the trial court with one exception. We remand for the court to correct an error in the final judgment assessing costs to show that the $100 cost of investigation is payable to the Daytona Beach Police Department, as orally pronounced by the trial court during sentencing and as agreed to by Appellant. The current cost judgment inadvertently reflects that this assessment is owed to the Volusia County Sheriff's Office.

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED to enter a corrected final judgment for costs.

LAMBERT, C.J., EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bolden v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Dec 2, 2022
No. 5D22-1435 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Bolden v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHNTEL DUWAYNE BOLDEN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District

Date published: Dec 2, 2022

Citations

No. 5D22-1435 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 2, 2022)