From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blecher v. Colletti

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Feb 1, 1993
154 Misc. 2d 760 (N.Y. App. Term 1993)

Opinion

February 1, 1993

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County, Dianne S. Gasworth, J.

Novick, Edelstein, Reisman, Lubell, Wasserman Leventhal, P.C., New York City (Paul Finkelstein of counsel), for appellant.

AIDS Service Center HIV Law Project, New York City (Theresa M. McGovern and Martha S. Jones of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

Order affirmed with $25 costs.

The parties to this nonpayment proceeding entered into a lease which provided for a discounted rent, the rent being discounted to bring it within the maximum that the Department of Social Services (DSS) would pay, and which further provided that the discount would be forfeited if, inter alia, either party commenced a legal action. When DSS failed to timely pay the second and third months' rent, landlord commenced this proceeding, seeking to recover the full nondiscounted rent. The trial court struck as unconscionable (Real Property Law § 235-c) the condition providing for a forfeiture of the discount upon either party's commencement of a legal action. We affirm. The clause in question improperly impinges upon rights granted by the Rent Stabilization Code, inter alia, and is unenforceable. We note the error in payment of rent was promptly corrected.

ARONIN, J.P., JOY and SCHOLNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Blecher v. Colletti

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Feb 1, 1993
154 Misc. 2d 760 (N.Y. App. Term 1993)
Case details for

Blecher v. Colletti

Case Details

Full title:MARK BLECHER, Appellant, v. RICHARD COLLETTI, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1993

Citations

154 Misc. 2d 760 (N.Y. App. Term 1993)
595 N.Y.S.2d 662

Citing Cases

Chili Venture LLC v. Stahl

When a provision in an adhesion lease abrogates public policy as reflected in a person's statutory rights,…