From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blanton v. County of Sacramento

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 22, 2010
No. 2:09-cv-01832-MCE-KJM (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2010)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-01832-MCE-KJM.

December 22, 2010


ORDER


Presently before the Court is Plaintiff David Blanton's Motion for Further Extension of the time within which to serve Defendant Crystal Fischer Bradnax with a copy of the Summons and First Amended Complaint in this matter. The Court previously extended the time within which Defendant Bradnax could be served until September 22, 2010.

According to Plaintiff's motion, because of various difficulties in locating Defendant Bradnax, he was not able to effectuate service until September 23, 2010, one day after the previously imposed deadline had expired. Plaintiff now seeks relief from that deadline so that the service he made on Bradnax will be deemed timely. No opposition has been filed to Plaintiff's Motion.

Given the lack of any opposition, and good cause appearing, Plaintiff's Motion for Further Extension (ECF No. 19) is hereby GRANTED. The time for Plaintiff to serve Defendant Crystal Fischer Bradnax is extended to and including September 23, 2010.

Because oral argument was not of material assistance, the Court ordered this matter submitted on the briefing. E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 21, 2010


Summaries of

Blanton v. County of Sacramento

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 22, 2010
No. 2:09-cv-01832-MCE-KJM (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2010)
Case details for

Blanton v. County of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:DAVID BLANTON, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO COUNTY…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 22, 2010

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-01832-MCE-KJM (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2010)