From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blanco v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 5, 2008
288 F. App'x 414 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-73191.

Submitted July 22, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed August 5, 2008.

Alma Lidia Raquel Natareno Blanco, Oakland, CA, pro se.

OIL, Kurt B. Larson, Esquire, Stacy S. Paddack, Esquire, DO J — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency No. A72-693-594.

Before: B. FLETCHER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Alma Lidia Raquel Natareno Blanco, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' affirmance of an immigration judge's denial of her application for cancellation of removal on the basis that she failed to demonstrate the requisite hardship to her United States citizen child. Petitioner contends that she met the hardship requirement of 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D). We lack jurisdiction to review the agency's discretionary hardship determination. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 929-30 (9th Cir. 2005).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Blanco v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 5, 2008
288 F. App'x 414 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Blanco v. Mukasey

Case Details

Full title:Alma Lidia Raquel Natareno BLANCO, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 5, 2008

Citations

288 F. App'x 414 (9th Cir. 2008)