From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Biaggi v. O'Flynn

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 11, 2023
2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 2584 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

No. 234 Index No. 153928/22 Case No. 2023-00574

05-11-2023

Mario Biaggi Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Barbara O'Flynn, Defendant-Respondent.

Mario Biaggi, Jr., New York, appellant pro se. Greenfield Stein & Senior, LLP, New York (Brooke Morris of counsel), for respondent.


Mario Biaggi, Jr., New York, appellant pro se.

Greenfield Stein & Senior, LLP, New York (Brooke Morris of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Oing, J.P., Singh, González, Kennedy, Scarpulla, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (William Franc Perry, J.), entered on or about September 9, 2022, which granted defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff's amended complaint is time-barred insofar as it is directed toward defendant's alleged statements to New York City Human Resources Adult Protection Services (APS) and the Queens County District Attorney's Office (the DA's Office) in June and July 2019 (see Casa de Meadows Inc. (Cayman Is.) v Zaman, 76 A.D.3d 917, 920 [1st Dept 2010] ["The statute of limitations for libel and slander... starts to run on the date of publication, so 'the fact that the libel may not have been discovered until later matters not'"], quoting Fleischer v Institute for Research in Hypnosis, 57 A.D.2d 535, 535 [1st Dept 1977]). Plaintiff commenced this action more than one year after these statements were made (see CPLR 215[3]; Smulyan v New York Liquidation Bur., 158 A.D.3d 456, 457 [1st Dept 2018]). In addition, plaintiff's bare legal conclusion that the purported defamation continued into 2022 is insufficient to save his claims (see Mamoon v Dot Net Inc., 135 A.D.3d 656, 658 [1st Dept 2016]).

As for his equitable estoppel argument, plaintiff failed to allege that defendant engaged in "subsequent and specific actions" that "somehow kept [him] from timely bringing suit" (Stroud Prods. & Enters., Inc. v BMG Music, 123 A.D.3d 598 [1st Dept 2014] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]).

In any event, even if plaintiff's claims were not time-barred, he has failed to state a claim for defamation, as the complaint does not allege the "exact words" complained of or the "time, place and manner of the alleged defamation" (see Offor v Mercy Med. Ctr., 171 A.D.3d 502, 503 [1st Dept 2019]).


Summaries of

Biaggi v. O'Flynn

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 11, 2023
2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 2584 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

Biaggi v. O'Flynn

Case Details

Full title:Mario Biaggi Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Barbara O'Flynn…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 11, 2023

Citations

2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 2584 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Citing Cases

Mehrotra v. Gen. Elec. Co.

Plaintiff contends that the action is not time-barred because he did not discover the statements until…

Chirag C. v. Kathleen D.

Plaintiff's causes of action for defamation-Counts (4) through (6)-have a one-year statute of limitations…