From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Betance v. Transport Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of California
Dec 15, 1988
253 Cal. Rptr. 839 (Cal. 1988)

Summary

concluding that undefined "terms of art" in a statute refer to the definitions provided by federal law

Summary of this case from Pico Neighborhood Ass'n v. City of Santa Monica

Opinion


Page __

__ Cal.3d __ 253 Cal.Rptr. 839, 765 P.2d 46 BETANCE v. TRANSPORT INSURANCE COMPANY. L.A. 32312. Supreme Court of California Dec. 15, 1988

         Prior report: Cal.App., 232 Cal.Rptr. 803.

         The above-entitled cause is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, with directions to vacate its opinion and to reconsider in light of Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Ins. Cos. (1988) 46 Cal.3d 287, 250 Cal.Rptr. 116, 758 P.2d 58.

         LUCAS, C.J., and PANELLI, ARGUELLES, EAGLESON and KAUFMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Betance v. Transport Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of California
Dec 15, 1988
253 Cal. Rptr. 839 (Cal. 1988)

concluding that undefined "terms of art" in a statute refer to the definitions provided by federal law

Summary of this case from Pico Neighborhood Ass'n v. City of Santa Monica
Case details for

Betance v. Transport Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:BETANCE v. TRANSPORT INSURANCE COMPANY.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Dec 15, 1988

Citations

253 Cal. Rptr. 839 (Cal. 1988)
765 P.2d 46

Citing Cases

Pico Neighborhood Ass'n v. City of Santa Monica

The similarities between the two schemes strongly suggest that "dilution" requires not only a showing that…

Brodehl v. Becker

In Bank. Prior Report: Cal.App., 253 Cal.Rptr. 839, 765 P.2d 46. The above-entitled review is transferred to…