From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bessinger v. Our Lady of Good Counsel

Supreme Court of Michigan
Sep 26, 2008
482 Mich. 996 (Mich. 2008)

Opinion

No. 128870.

September 26, 2008.

Court of Appeals No. 259974.


Summary Dispositions September 26, 2008.

By order of January 31, 2006, this case was remanded to the Workers' Compensation Appellate Commission for a supplemental opinion. On order of the Court, the opinion having been received, the application for leave to appeal the April 29, 2005, order of the Court of Appeals is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we vacate the prior decisions of the workers' compensation tribunals and we remand this case to the Board of Magistrates for a new hearing and a decision consistent with this Court's decision in Stokes v Chrysler LLC, 481 Mich 266 (2008). The plaintiffs current entitlement to benefits shall continue until a new decision is issued by the board. We do not retain jurisdiction.


I dissent from the order vacating the decisions of the workers' compensation tribunals and remanding this case to the Board of Magistrates for a new hearing and decision consistent with this Court's decision in Stokes v Chrysler LLC, 481 Mich 266 (2008).

Because I dissented from the majority opinion in Stokes v Chrysler LLC, I vote to grant leave to appeal in this case to consider whether a majority of this Court reached the correct decision in Stokes.

KELLY, J. I would deny leave to appeal.


Summaries of

Bessinger v. Our Lady of Good Counsel

Supreme Court of Michigan
Sep 26, 2008
482 Mich. 996 (Mich. 2008)
Case details for

Bessinger v. Our Lady of Good Counsel

Case Details

Full title:BESSINGER v. OUR LADY OF GOOD COUNSEL

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Sep 26, 2008

Citations

482 Mich. 996 (Mich. 2008)

Citing Cases

Bessinger v. Our Lady of Good Counsel/Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Detroit

With the clarification, and having retained jurisdiction, our Supreme Court entered an order in 2008 that is…

Beckes v. Detroit Diesel Corp.

As I observed in Rowland, that the majority justices have overruled precedent more often than the dissenting…