From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bennett v. Rockrose Development Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 2, 1985
64 N.Y.2d 1155 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Decided May 2, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Allen Murray Myers, J.

Jeff H. Galloway and George D. Sullivan for appellants.

Steven L. Schultz for respondents.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 106 A.D.2d 256). Plaintiffs' constitutional challenge to the retroactive application of revised Real Property Law § 226-b was considered and rejected in Vance v Century Apts. Assoc. ( 61 N.Y.2d 716). ( See also, Blum v West End Assoc., 64 N.Y.2d 939.)

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE. Taking no part: Judge ALEXANDER.


Summaries of

Bennett v. Rockrose Development Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 2, 1985
64 N.Y.2d 1155 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

Bennett v. Rockrose Development Corp.

Case Details

Full title:RIVA BENNETT et al., Appellants, v. ROCKROSE DEVELOPMENT CORP. et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 2, 1985

Citations

64 N.Y.2d 1155 (N.Y. 1985)
490 N.Y.S.2d 769
480 N.E.2d 383

Citing Cases

Sitomer v. Melohn Properties Management

Daniel J. Sitomer, appellant pro se.Jeffrey R. Metz for respondent. On review of submissions pursuant to…

Regina Metro. Co. v. N.Y. State Div. of Hous. & Cmty. Renewal

The amended section stated that "[t]he provisions of this section ... shall apply to all actions and…