From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Hous. Auth. of City of Sacramento

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 9, 2021
2:20-cv-02539-TLN-JDP (PS) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-02539-TLN-JDP (PS)

09-09-2021

DELTHENIA BELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF DELTHENIA BELL'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

ECF NO. 31

JEREMY D. PETERSON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Delthenia Bell moves for an extension of time before the court holds its initial scheduling conference. ECF No. 31. For good cause shown, this motion is granted. The court's initial scheduling conference is reset to October 28, 2021.

Bell asserts that she needs to file two motions before the conference. As a point of clarification, the parties are not required by the court to file any motions regarding the scheduling conference. The parties are simply required to file a joint statement regarding scheduling and discovery to help the court prepare a scheduling order. There is currently no deadline in place in this case regarding the filing of dispositive motions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bell v. Hous. Auth. of City of Sacramento

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 9, 2021
2:20-cv-02539-TLN-JDP (PS) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Bell v. Hous. Auth. of City of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:DELTHENIA BELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 9, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-02539-TLN-JDP (PS) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2021)