From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beesla v. Pierce Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 27, 2021
3:21-cv-05619-DGE (W.D. Wash. Dec. 27, 2021)

Opinion

3:21-cv-05619-DGE

12-27-2021

MANJINDER SINGH BEESLA, Plaintiff, v. PIERCE COUNTY SHERRIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

David G. Estudillo United States District Judge

On August 25, 2021, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that the Pierce County Sherriff's Department failed to protect him from harassment at his home and workplace by not responding to several 911 calls. (Dkt. No. 1-1 at 4-6.)

Plaintiff filed his complaint alleging violations of 28 U.S.C. § 1346. (Dkt. No. 1-1 at 3.) Because 28 U.S.C. § 1346 pertains to lawsuits against the United States, it would not apply to the Pierce County Sherriff's Department. Accordingly, the Court construed Plaintiff's complaint as one filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Dkt. No. 6 at 1.)

On October 19, 2021, this Court issued an order directing Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed after concluding that Plaintiff had not identified any viable cause of action in his complaint. (Dkt. No. 6.) The Court explained that Plaintiff failed to allege facts upon which any individual Defendant was liable, and did not allege facts that would plausibly establish causation between the acts or omissions of the Defendant and a deprivation of Plaintiff's rights. (Id. at 4-5.) The Court further explained that Plaintiff had failed to allege a cause of action against the Pierce County Sherriff's Department. (Id.) Plaintiff did not respond to the Court's order to show cause.

On December 8, 2021, United States Magistrate Judge Theresa Fricke, finding that Plaintiff had not responded to the Order to Show Cause, issued a report and recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that Plaintiff's complaint and this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (Dkt. No. 7.) Plaintiff did not respond to the R&R.

The Court, having reviewed Plaintiff's complaint, the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Theresa Fricke, United States Magistrate Judge, any objections thereto, and the remaining record, hereby finds and ORDERS as follows:

(1) The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;

(2) Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the order to show cause; and

(3) The Clerk shall close this case.


Summaries of

Beesla v. Pierce Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 27, 2021
3:21-cv-05619-DGE (W.D. Wash. Dec. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Beesla v. Pierce Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

Case Details

Full title:MANJINDER SINGH BEESLA, Plaintiff, v. PIERCE COUNTY SHERRIFF'S DEPARTMENT…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Dec 27, 2021

Citations

3:21-cv-05619-DGE (W.D. Wash. Dec. 27, 2021)