From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beach Point Condo. v. Beach Point

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 31, 1985
480 So. 2d 239 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Summary

In Beach Point, the court ruled that a condominium association was not a third-party beneficiary of a payment and performance bond secured by the general contractor in favor of the original owner-developer of the condominium.

Summary of this case from The Marse v. Travel Casualty

Opinion

No. 84-2562.

December 31, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, William C. Williams, III, J.

Vladimir R. Martinez and Richard L. Martens of Boose, Cicklin, Martens Lubitz, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Larry Klein of Klein Beranek, P.A. and Easley Massa Willits, West Palm Beach, for appellees.


We affirm the decision of the trial court holding that a condominium association was not a third party beneficiary on a payment and performance bond secured by the general contractor in favor of the original owner-developer of the condominium. American Surety Company of New York v. Smith, 100 Fla. 1012, 130 So. 440 (1930). Although the association's creation may have been foreseen, it appears that the association was not even in existence at the time the construction contract was executed and the bond secured. Under these circumstances, and the unambiguous provisions of the bond, we fail to see any basis for a claim that it is manifest from the terms of the bond that the parties intended to benefit the association.

ANSTEAD and DELL, JJ., concur.

WALDEN, J., dissents with opinion.


In my opinion the dismissal of appellant's complaint was premature. I would reverse and remand for a determination of the intent of the parties, i.e., whether or not appellant was a third party beneficiary on the payment and performance bond, this being a mixed question of fact and law. Moreover, it is to be noted that construction was not completed at the time appellant took over from the developer which fact creates the anomaly that the appellant is the only aggrieved party. If it cannot sue, then the bond is a nullity. I would reverse upon authority of Crabtree v. Aetna Casualty Surety Company v. Crabtree, 383 So.2d 657 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).


Summaries of

Beach Point Condo. v. Beach Point

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 31, 1985
480 So. 2d 239 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

In Beach Point, the court ruled that a condominium association was not a third-party beneficiary of a payment and performance bond secured by the general contractor in favor of the original owner-developer of the condominium.

Summary of this case from The Marse v. Travel Casualty
Case details for

Beach Point Condo. v. Beach Point

Case Details

Full title:BEACH POINT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., APPELLANT, v. BEACH POINT…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 31, 1985

Citations

480 So. 2d 239 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

The Marse v. Travel Casualty

Gulf Power Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 445 So. 2d 1141, 1142 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Further, Beach Point…

Carteret Savings Bank v. Durham

Upon exhaustive briefing and thorough review of the allegations in the pleadings, we agree with this…