From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bd. of Managers of Carriage House Condo. v. Healy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jan 19, 2021
190 A.D.3d 546 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

12903N & M-2441, M-3245 Index No. 150491/19 Case No. 2020-02423

01-19-2021

BOARD OF MANAGERS OF CARRIAGE HOUSE CONDOMINIUM, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Valeria Calafiore HEALY et al., Defendants–Appellants.

Healy LLC, New York (Valeria Calafiore Healy of counsel), for Valeria Calafiore Healy and for John A. Healy, appellants. Ropers Majeski, P.C., New York (Eric C. Weissman and Matthew A. Beyer of counsel), for respondent.


Healy LLC, New York (Valeria Calafiore Healy of counsel), for Valeria Calafiore Healy and for John A. Healy, appellants.

Ropers Majeski, P.C., New York (Eric C. Weissman and Matthew A. Beyer of counsel), for respondent.

Webber, J.P., Mazzarelli, Gonza´lez, Scarpulla, Shulman, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (James Edward d'Auguste, J.), entered May 11, 2020, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Plaintiff is directed to post a bond in the amount of $1000.

Plaintiff commenced this action allegedly to enforce its right to access defendants' unit in plaintiff's condominium to make repairs to AC condensers located in defendants' unit that service other units in the condominium. Supreme Court granted plaintiff's motion and ordered that, upon one day's notice, defendants allow HVAC workers performing repairs or services into their unit to perform necessary HVAC maintenance and repairs, and that any such HVAC workers be accompanied by an individual associated with the managing agent for the condominium.

We review Supreme Court's disposition of a motion for a preliminary injunction and find there was no abuse of discretion (see J.A. Preston Corp. v. Fabrication Enters., 68 N.Y.2d 397, 406, 509 N.Y.S.2d 520, 502 N.E.2d 197 [1986] ; Adirondack Park Agency v. Hunt Bros. Contrs., 234 A.D.2d 737, 738, 651 N.Y.S.2d 634 [3d Dept. 1996] ; Rosemont Enters. v. Irving, 49 A.D.2d 445, 448, 375 N.Y.S.2d 864 [1st Dept. 1975], appeal dismissed 41 N.Y.2d 829, 393 N.Y.S.2d 399, 361 N.E.2d 1047 [1977] ).

The parties' remaining arguments are either academic in view of the foregoing, or unavailing.

Bd. of Mgrs. of Carriage House Condominium v. Healy

M–2441 Motion to enlarge the record and to take judicial notice denied as unnecessary.

M–3245 Motion for sanctions denied.


Summaries of

Bd. of Managers of Carriage House Condo. v. Healy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jan 19, 2021
190 A.D.3d 546 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Bd. of Managers of Carriage House Condo. v. Healy

Case Details

Full title:Board of Managers of Carriage House Condominium, Plaintiff-Respondent, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 19, 2021

Citations

190 A.D.3d 546 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 249
136 N.Y.S.3d 700

Citing Cases

Healy v. Settle

The Healys appealed this Court's decision, which was affirmed by the Appellate Division, First Department on…

Healy v. Carriage House LLC

The other actions are: Matter of Healy v Carriage House Condominium, Sup Ct, NY County, index No. 160850/2017…