From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bayne v. Roberts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1985
112 A.D.2d 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

July 12, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Siracuse, J.

Present — Hancock, Jr., J.P., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and Green, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to Supreme court, Monroe County, for a hearing, in accordance with the following memorandum: The mother appeals from the denial without a hearing of her application for modification of a prior order granting custody of the parties' two children to the father. When the parties were divorced in 1978 they agreed that the mother should have custody. In 1981, after a hearing, the father gained custody, primarily, according to the court's written decision, because of the instability in the mother's life caused by the imminent breakup of her second marriage. The mother in her application to regain custody claims that she is happily remarried and can now provide the children with a stable home. It was error to deny her application without a hearing. Inasmuch as neither parent has a prima facie right to custody ( see, Domestic Relations Law §§ 70, 240) and the primary concern in a custody proceeding is the best interests of the children ( see, Domestic Relations Law §§ 70, 240; Friederwitzer v. Friederwitzer, 55 N.Y.2d 89), the issue of custody here can only be resolved after a full hearing ( see generally, Friederwitzer v. Friederwitzer, supra; State ex rel. Hathaway v. Baker, 103 A.D.2d 762; Anstett v. Wolcott, 94 A.D.2d 692).


Summaries of

Bayne v. Roberts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1985
112 A.D.2d 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Bayne v. Roberts

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA BAYNE, Formerly Known as PATRICIA A. SMITH, and Prior Thereto…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1985

Citations

112 A.D.2d 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Metzger v. Metzger

We agree with plaintiff's contention that a plenary hearing is necessary before the motion to modify the…

Baum v. Baum

The agreement, incorporated in the divorce decree, gave custody of the child to her 69-year-old father but…