From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baum v. Baum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 23, 1986
120 A.D.2d 951 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

May 23, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Grow, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Callahan, Denman, Pine and Balio, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Onondaga County, for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: The court denied the mother's motion for change of custody of her six-year-old daughter without holding a hearing, relying on evidence at an earlier divorce trial terminated by an agreement and on conversations with the parties and their attorneys at an informal conference approximately one year later. Since neither of those proceedings is in the record before us, appellate review is impossible. The agreement, incorporated in the divorce decree, gave custody of the child to her 69-year-old father but provided that the child would live with the father's adult son and daughter-in-law. It is undisputed that this arrangement is no longer available for the child. This is a significant change of circumstance requiring a hearing to determine the child's best interests (see, Obey v Degling, 37 N.Y.2d 768, 770; Bayne v Roberts, 112 A.D.2d 775; Bellinger v Bellinger, 109 A.D.2d 1104). The mother's failure to make an explicit request for a hearing in her motion papers does not constitute a waiver of a hearing on the facts in this case (cf. Kuleszo v Kuleszo, 59 A.D.2d 1059, lv denied 43 N.Y.2d 647).


Summaries of

Baum v. Baum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 23, 1986
120 A.D.2d 951 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Baum v. Baum

Case Details

Full title:ADAM BAUM, Respondent, v. CLAIRE BAUM, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 23, 1986

Citations

120 A.D.2d 951 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

David W. v. Julia W

" Clearly, in any award of custody, the best interests of the children are the paramount concern of the court…