From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bates v. Molins Richmond, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Nov 7, 2006
Record No. 1543-06-2 (Va. Ct. App. Nov. 7, 2006)

Opinion

Record No. 1543-06-2.

November 7, 2006.

Appeal from the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission.

(Jamie L. Karek; Geoffrey R. McDonald Associates, P.C., on brief), for appellant.

(S. Vernon Priddy III; Paul W. Emigholz; Nancy J. Wan; Sands Anderson Marks Miller, on brief), for appellees.

Present: Judges Kelsey, Petty and Senior Judge Bumgardner.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.


Raymond Garnett Bates (claimant) appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission finding that his claim was barred by the statute of limitations. Claimant argues the commission erred in failing to apply the doctrine of imposition to save his claim. We have reviewed the record and the commission's opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Bates v. Molins Richmond, Inc., VWC File No. 201-16-16 (May 23, 2006). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Because claimant limited his argument on appeal to the issue of imposition, that is the only issue we consider.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Bates v. Molins Richmond, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Nov 7, 2006
Record No. 1543-06-2 (Va. Ct. App. Nov. 7, 2006)
Case details for

Bates v. Molins Richmond, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND GARNETT BATES, v. MOLINS RICHMOND, INC. AND INSURANCE COMPANY OF…

Court:Court of Appeals of Virginia

Date published: Nov 7, 2006

Citations

Record No. 1543-06-2 (Va. Ct. App. Nov. 7, 2006)